A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Lone Pine Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Lone Pine Capital | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2007 | 1997 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 29 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mid ($5–20B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | private equity-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Moderate |
| Strategies | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured | |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | private equity, hedge funds |
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Lone Pine Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | North America, Europe, Global, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 1 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | Lone Mountain Pine Strategy |
| Vintage range | — | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | Investing (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 8 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 32/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 7/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 3 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 2% | |
| Geography overlap | 14% | |
