A side-by-side comparison of HPS Investment Partners and Capula Investment Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| HPS Investment Partners | Capula Investment Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2007 | 2005 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 21 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | fixed income-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 17 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Unitranche, Senior Secured | |
| Asset classes | fixed income, private credit | hedge funds, fixed income, other |
HPS Investment Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Capula Investment Management is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Shared asset classes | 1: fixed income |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Global |
| Regions | North America, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 6 | 5 |
| Largest fund | HPS Strategic Investment Partners V | Capula Tail Risk Fund — Series D |
| Vintage range | — | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (4), Fundraising (2) | Investing (4), Fundraising (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 21 | 8 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 32/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 7/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 3 | 1 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 7% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
| Geography overlap | 14% | |
