DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/HarbourVest Partners vs Schroders
← Back to firms

HarbourVest Partners vs Schroders

A side-by-side comparison of HarbourVest Partners and Schroders across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

HarbourVest Partners$125B
SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Insight

Schroders manages roughly 6.1× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: HarbourVest PartnersRight bar: Schroders
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Schroders is the largest by AUM at $766.7B — 6.13× HarbourVest Partners ($125B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 178 years before HarbourVest Partners (1982).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 4 for HarbourVest Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Infrastructure.
  • • HarbourVest Partners is the only one here in Secondaries.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, United Kingdom.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 38/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 11% (Jaccard) — 7 shared: GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Fund-of-Funds and 4 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 23%, driven by 4 shared strategies, 3 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
23%Similarity score4 shared strategies · 3 shared asset classes · same AUM band
HarbourVest PartnersSchroders
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
Founded19821804
Firm age44 yrs222 yrs
RolesLp, GpLp, Gp
Scale & AUM
AUM$125BEUR 766.7B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio6.1× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies11 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Fund-of-Funds28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment
Asset classessecondaries, private equity, private credit, infrastructureprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other
Shared strategies7: GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Fund-of-Funds
Shared asset classes3: private equity, private credit, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaUnited Kingdom
RegionsNorth America, Europe, North America, Western EuropeUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia
Shared geographiesEurope
Fund Portfolio
Published funds528
Largest fundHarbourVest Partners Co-Investment Fund VII Program (HCF VII)Schroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV
Vintage range—2023–2026
Fund statusesClosed (5)Fundraising (26), Closed (2)
Team
Total contacts2538
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity38/10070/100
Network strength5/10032/100
Relationships423
Relationship densityLowHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity23%
Strategy overlap11%
Asset class overlap33%
Geography overlap14%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between HarbourVest Partners and Schroders?

HarbourVest Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, HarbourVest Partners or Schroders?

By reported AUM, Schroders is larger ($125B vs EUR 766.7B).

HarbourVest Partners profile →Schroders profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news