DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/HarbourVest Partners vs Blue Owl Capital
← Back to firms

HarbourVest Partners vs Blue Owl Capital

A side-by-side comparison of HarbourVest Partners and Blue Owl Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

HarbourVest Partners$125B
Blue Owl Capital$319B
Insight

Blue Owl Capital manages roughly 2.6× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: HarbourVest PartnersRight bar: Blue Owl Capital
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Blue Owl Capital is the largest by AUM at $319B — 2.55× HarbourVest Partners ($125B).
  • • HarbourVest Partners is the most established (founded 1982), 39 years before Blue Owl Capital (2021).
  • • Blue Owl Capital has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 4 for HarbourVest Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Secondaries, Private Equity, Private Credit, +1 more.
  • • Blue Owl Capital is the only one here in Real Estate & Venture Capital.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • Blue Owl Capital's network is more connected (64/100 vs 38/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 7% (Jaccard) — 3 shared: GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Direct Lending.
  • • Overall similarity is 31%, driven by 3 shared strategies, 4 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
31%Similarity score3 shared strategies · 4 shared asset classes · same AUM band · same country
HarbourVest PartnersBlue Owl Capital
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded19822021
Firm age44 yrs5 yrs
RolesLp, GpGp, Lender, Public Listing
Scale & AUM
AUM$125B$319B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio2.6× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies11 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Fund-of-Funds34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche
Asset classessecondaries, private equity, private credit, infrastructureprivate credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capital
Shared strategies3: GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Direct Lending
Shared asset classes4: secondaries, private equity, private credit, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaUnited States
RegionsNorth America, Europe, North America, Western EuropeUnited States, Canada, Europe, United States
Shared geographiesEurope
Fund Portfolio
Published funds525
Largest fundHarbourVest Partners Co-Investment Fund VII Program (HCF VII)Blue Owl GP Stakes V
Vintage range—2015–2026
Fund statusesClosed (5)Closed (24), Fundraising (1)
Performance
Avg. net IRR—13.1%
Avg. TVPI—1.52x
Team
Total contacts2532
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.1 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity38/10064/100
Network strength5/10036/100
Relationships421
Relationship densityLowHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity31%
Strategy overlap7%
Asset class overlap67%
Geography overlap8%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between HarbourVest Partners and Blue Owl Capital?

HarbourVest Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, HarbourVest Partners or Blue Owl Capital?

By reported AUM, Blue Owl Capital is larger ($125B vs $319B).

HarbourVest Partners profile →Blue Owl Capital profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news