A side-by-side comparison of Golub Capital and Antin Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Golub Capital manages roughly 2.7× the assets of the other firm.
| Golub Capital | Antin Infrastructure Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | France |
| Founded | 1994 | 2007 |
| Firm age | 32 yrs | 19 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Lender | Gp, Public Listing |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $90B | EUR 33.3B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 2.7× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | infrastructure-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Moderate |
Golub Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Antin Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in France. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Golub Capital is larger ($90B vs EUR 33.3B).
| Strategies |
| 13 — Direct Lending, Unitranche, First Lien, Second Lien |
| 7 — Value-Add, Digital Infrastructure, Transport, Renewables |
| Asset classes | private credit, fixed income, secondaries, private equity | infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | Europe |
| Regions | United States, United Kingdom, Germany, France | Europe, North America |
| Shared geographies | Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 7 | 10 |
| Largest fund | GEMS Fund 6, L.P. | Antin Flagship Fund V |
| Vintage range | 2015–2024 | 2008–2022 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (7) | Closed (9), Fundraising (1) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | 9.8% | — |
| Avg. TVPI | 1.58x | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 33 | 94 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.4 per $B | 2.8 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 46/100 | 73/100 |
| Network strength | 17/100 | 54/100 |
| Relationships | 11 | 46 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 17% | |
| Geography overlap | 14% | |