DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Fidelity Investments vs Schroders
← Back to firms

Fidelity Investments vs Schroders

A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity Investments and Schroders across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Fidelity Investments$7.8T
SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Insight

Fidelity Investments manages roughly 10.2× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Fixed Income
Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: Fidelity InvestmentsRight bar: Schroders
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Fidelity Investments is the largest by AUM at $7.8T — 10.17× Schroders ($766.7B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 142 years before Fidelity Investments (1946).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 6 for Fidelity Investments.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Fixed Income, Private Equity, Private Credit, +3 more.
  • • Schroders is the only one here in Infrastructure & Cash.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, United Kingdom.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 8/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 19% (Jaccard) — 8 shared: Real Estate Debt, Fund-of-Funds, Co-investment and 5 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 37%, driven by 8 shared strategies, 6 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
37%Similarity score8 shared strategies · 6 shared asset classes · same AUM band
Fidelity InvestmentsSchroders
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
Founded19461804
Firm age80 yrs222 yrs
RolesGp, Advisor, LenderLp, Gp
Scale & AUM
AUM$7.8TEUR 766.7B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio10.2× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies23 — Digital Assets / Crypto, Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment
Asset classesfixed income, private equity, private credit, real estate, other, venture capitalprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other
Shared strategies8: Real Estate Debt, Fund-of-Funds, Co-investment
Shared asset classes6: fixed income, private equity, private credit, real estate, other, venture capital
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaUnited Kingdom
RegionsGlobal, North America, North America, United StatesUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia
Shared geographiesUnited States
Fund Portfolio
Published funds1728
Largest fundFidelity Credit Opportunities Fund II LPSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV
Vintage range2020–20262023–2026
Fund statusesInvesting (17)Fundraising (26), Closed (2)
Team
Total contacts1838
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity8/10070/100
Network strength1/10032/100
Relationships123
Relationship densityLowHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity37%
Strategy overlap19%
Asset class overlap75%
Geography overlap14%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Fidelity Investments and Schroders?

Fidelity Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Fidelity Investments or Schroders?

By reported AUM, Fidelity Investments is larger ($7.8T vs EUR 766.7B).

Fidelity Investments profile →Schroders profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news