DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutData methodologyPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Fidelity Investments vs Lexington Partners
← Back to firms

Fidelity Investments vs Lexington Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity Investments and Lexington Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Fidelity Investments$7.8T
Lexington Partners$84B
Insight

Fidelity Investments manages roughly 92.9× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Fixed Income
Left bar: Fidelity InvestmentsRight bar: Lexington Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Fidelity Investments is the largest by AUM at $7.8T — 92.86× Lexington Partners ($84B).
  • • Fidelity Investments is the most established (founded 1946), 48 years before Lexington Partners (1994).
  • • Fidelity Investments has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 3 for Lexington Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Venture Capital.
  • • Fidelity Investments is the only one here in Fixed Income & Private Credit, +2 more.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • Lexington Partners's network is more connected (23/100 vs 8/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 14% (Jaccard) — 4 shared: Co-investment, Secondaries (LP-led), Buyout and 1 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 17%, driven by 4 shared strategies, 2 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
17%Similarity score4 shared strategies · 2 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band · same country
Fidelity InvestmentsLexington Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded19461994
Firm age80 yrs32 yrs
RolesGp, Advisor, LenderLp, Gp
Scale & AUM
AUM$7.8T$84B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio92.9× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies23 — Digital Assets / Crypto, Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment
Asset classesfixed income, private equity, private credit, real estate, other, venture capitalsecondaries, private equity, venture capital
Shared strategies4: Co-investment, Secondaries (LP-led), Buyout
Shared asset classes2: private equity, venture capital
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaUnited States
RegionsGlobal, North America, North America, United States
Fund Portfolio
Published funds171
Largest fundFidelity Credit Opportunities Fund II LPLexington Capital Partners X
Vintage range2020–20262023
Fund statusesInvesting (17)Closed (1)
Team
Total contacts1850
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.6 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity8/10023/100
Network strength1/1003/100
Relationships12
Relationship densityLowLow
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity17%
Strategy overlap14%
Asset class overlap29%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Fidelity Investments and Lexington Partners?

Fidelity Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Fidelity Investments or Lexington Partners?

By reported AUM, Fidelity Investments is larger ($7.8T vs $84B).

Fidelity Investments profile →Lexington Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news