A side-by-side comparison of Everstone Group and Lexington Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Everstone Group | Lexington Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | Singapore | United States |
| Founded | 2006 | 1994 |
| Firm age | 20 yrs | 32 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Lp, Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Mid ($5–20B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private equity-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Broad |
| Strategies | 10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment | |
| Asset classes | private equity, venture capital | secondaries, private equity, venture capital |
Everstone Group is a asset manager based in Singapore, while Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, venture capital |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Asia | Not recorded |
| Regions | Asia, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 1 |
| Largest fund | Everstone Capital Partners | Lexington Capital Partners X |
| Vintage range | 2025 | 2023 |
| Fund statuses | Investing (5) | Closed (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 13 | 50 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 1 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 13% | |
| Asset class overlap | 67% | |
