A side-by-side comparison of Capula Investment Management and Pershing Square Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Capula Investment Management | Pershing Square Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United Kingdom | United States |
| Founded | 2005 | 2003 |
| Firm age | 21 yrs | 23 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Diversified |
| Asset classes | hedge funds, fixed income, other | private equity, real estate, hedge funds |
| Shared asset classes | 1: hedge funds | |
Capula Investment Management is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while Pershing Square Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, Europe, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Global | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Capula Tail Risk Fund — Series D | — |
| Vintage range | 2025 | — |
| Fund statuses | Investing (4), Fundraising (1) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 8 | 8 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 13/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 1/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 2 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 15% | |
| Asset class overlap | 20% | |
| Geography overlap | 75% | |
