A side-by-side comparison of Blue Owl Capital and Capula Investment Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Blue Owl Capital | Capula Investment Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2021 | 2005 |
| Firm age | 5 yrs | 21 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Lender, Public Listing | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche | |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capital | |
Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Capula Investment Management is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| hedge funds, fixed income, other |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | Global |
| Regions | United States, Canada, Europe, United States | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | Europe, Europe, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 25 | 5 |
| Largest fund | Blue Owl GP Stakes V | Capula Tail Risk Fund — Series D |
| Vintage range | 2015–2026 | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (24), Fundraising (1) | Investing (4), Fundraising (1) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | 13.1% | — |
| Avg. TVPI | 1.52x | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 32 | 8 |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 5/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 1 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 2% | |
| Geography overlap | 15% | |