A side-by-side comparison of BIA and Alaska Permanent Fund across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
BIA manages roughly 1.2× the assets of the other firm.
| BIA | Alaska Permanent Fund | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Sovereign Wealth Fund | Sovereign Wealth Fund |
| Country | Brunei | United States |
| Founded | 1983 | 1976 |
| Firm age | 43 yrs | 50 yrs |
| Roles | Lp | Lp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $72.56B | $61B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.2× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Broad |
| Strategies | ||
BIA is a sovereign wealth fund based in Brunei, while Alaska Permanent Fund is a sovereign wealth fund based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, BIA is larger ($72.56B vs $61B).
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| 49 — Buyout, Growth Equity, Venture Growth, Co-investment |
| Asset classes | private equity, real estate, hedge funds, venture capital | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, other, fixed income, cash, venture capital |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, real estate, hedge funds, venture capital |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Not recorded | Global |
| Regions | United States, Europe, Asia, Latin America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 2 |
| Largest fund | — | Na'-Nuk Investment Fund, LP |
| Vintage range | — | 2019–2020 |
| Fund statuses | — | Closed (2) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 0 | 32 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.5 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 1 |
| Relationship density | None | High |
| Network maturity | No network | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 24% | |
| Asset class overlap | 44% | |
