Ares Management vs Monroe Capital

A side-by-side comparison of Ares Management and Monroe Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Ares Managementn/d

Monroe Capital$23.8B

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity

Private Credit

Real Estate

Hedge Funds

Infrastructure

Left bar: Ares ManagementRight bar: Monroe Capital

Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

• Ares Management is the most established (founded 1997), 7 years before Monroe Capital (2004).
• Ares Management has the broadest mandate — active across 5 asset classes vs 3 for Monroe Capital.
• All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate.
• Ares Management is the only one here in Hedge Funds & Infrastructure.
• All 2 are headquartered in United States.
• Ares Management's network is more connected (42/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
• Overall similarity is 14%, driven by 3 shared asset classes, same country.

14%Similarity score3 shared asset classes · same country

	Ares Management	Monroe Capital
Basics
Firm type	Asset Manager	Asset Manager
Country	United States	United States
Founded	1997	2004
Firm age	29 yrs	22 yrs
Roles	Gp, Lender	Gp
Scale & AUM
AUM		$23.8B
Market position	Large ($20–100B)	Large ($20–100B)
Strategy & Focus
Investment style	Multi-asset	Multi-asset
Diversification	Broad	Broad
Strategies		16 — Direct Lending, Senior Secured, Unitranche, Asset-Based Lending

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Ares Management and Monroe Capital?

Ares Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Monroe Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Ares Management or Monroe Capital?

AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.

Ares Management profile →Monroe Capital profile →

Explore more

All firms Build a custom comparison More Asset Manager firms Firms in United States Market intelligence Latest news

Geography
Geographic bias	North America	United States
Regions	United States, North America, Europe, Asia	United States, Canada
Shared geographies	United States, Canada, United States

Fund Portfolio
Published funds	0	12
Largest fund	—	Monroe Capital Private Credit Fund V
Vintage range	—	2014–2026
Fund statuses	—	Closed (10), Fundraising (2)

Team
Total contacts	3	39
Team-to-AUM ratio	—	1.6 per $B

Network & Relationships
Connectivity	42/100	0/100
Network strength	16/100	0/100
Relationships	7	0
Relationship density	Moderate	Moderate
Network maturity	Emerging	Emerging

Similarity
Overall similarity	14%
Asset class overlap	60%
Geography overlap	11%