A side-by-side comparison of AQR Capital Management and Antin Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
AQR Capital Management manages roughly 7.1× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| AQR Capital Management | Antin Infrastructure Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | France |
| Founded | 1998 | 2007 |
| Firm age | 28 yrs | 19 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Public Listing |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $237.8B | EUR 33.3B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 7.1× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | hedge funds-focused | infrastructure-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Moderate |
AQR Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Antin Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in France. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, AQR Capital Management is larger ($237.8B vs EUR 33.3B).
| Strategies |
| 15 — Quantitative, Equity Market Neutral, Managed Futures / CTA, Multi-strategy |
| 7 — Value-Add, Digital Infrastructure, Transport, Renewables |
| Asset classes | hedge funds, other | infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, South Africa | Europe, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 22 | 10 |
| Largest fund | AQR Alternative Risk Premia Fund | Antin Flagship Fund V |
| Vintage range | — | 2008–2022 |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (22) | Closed (9), Fundraising (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 37 | 94 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.2 per $B | 2.8 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 0/100 | 73/100 |
| Network strength | 0/100 | 54/100 |
| Relationships | 0 | 46 |
| Relationship density | Low | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 17% | |
| Geography overlap | 40% | |