A side-by-side comparison of Antin Infrastructure Partners and Schroders across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Schroders manages roughly 23.0× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Antin Infrastructure Partners | Schroders | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | France | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 2007 | 1804 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 222 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Public Listing | Lp, Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | EUR 33.3B | EUR 766.7B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 23.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | infrastructure-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Broad |
Antin Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in France, while Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Schroders is larger (EUR 33.3B vs EUR 766.7B).
| Strategies |
| 7 — Value-Add, Digital Infrastructure, Transport, Renewables |
| 28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment |
| Asset classes | infrastructure | private equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other |
| Shared strategies | 2: Digital Infrastructure, Renewables |
| Shared asset classes | 1: infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | United Kingdom |
| Regions | Europe, North America | United Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia |
| Shared geographies | Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 10 | 28 |
| Largest fund | Antin Flagship Fund V | Schroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV |
| Vintage range | 2008–2022 | 2023–2026 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (9), Fundraising (1) | Fundraising (26), Closed (2) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 94 | 38 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 2.8 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 73/100 | 23/100 |
| Network strength | 54/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 46 | 2 |
| Relationship density | Very high | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 14% | |
| Strategy overlap | 6% | |
| Asset class overlap | 13% | |
| Geography overlap | 17% | |