A side-by-side comparison of Antin Infrastructure Partners and Russell Investments across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Russell Investments manages roughly 12.5× the assets of the other firm.
| Antin Infrastructure Partners | Russell Investments | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | France | United States |
| Founded | 2007 | 1936 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 90 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Public Listing | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | EUR 33.3B | $416B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 12.5× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | infrastructure-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Broad |
Antin Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in France, while Russell Investments is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Russell Investments is larger (EUR 33.3B vs $416B).
| Strategies |
| 7 — Value-Add, Digital Infrastructure, Transport, Renewables |
| Asset classes | infrastructure | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 1: infrastructure |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | Global |
| Regions | Europe, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | Europe, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 10 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Antin Flagship Fund V | — |
| Vintage range | 2008–2022 | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (9), Fundraising (1) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 94 | 3 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 2.8 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 73/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 54/100 | 2/100 |
| Relationships | 46 | 1 |
| Relationship density | Very high | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 22% | |
| Asset class overlap | 14% | |
| Geography overlap | 50% | |