A side-by-side comparison of AlpInvest Partners and Hamilton Lane across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| AlpInvest Partners | Hamilton Lane | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | Netherlands | United States |
| Founded | 1999 | 1991 |
| Firm age | 27 yrs | 35 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Lp, Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $146.3B | |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private equity-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Broad |
| Strategies | 23 — Co-investment, Fund-of-Funds, SMA / Managed Account, Evergreen / Semi-liquid Structure | |
AlpInvest Partners is a asset manager based in Netherlands, while Hamilton Lane is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
AUM figures are not fully available for both firms on DataBane yet.
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit | private equity, private credit, real estate, secondaries, infrastructure, venture capital |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, private credit |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Europe | North America |
| Regions | Europe, Asia, Europe, Global | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Middle East |
| Shared geographies | Europe, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 19 |
| Largest fund | — | Hamilton Lane Secondary Fund VI |
| Fund statuses | — | Closed (6), Fundraising (13) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 7 | 44 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | — | 0.3 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 32/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 6/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 3 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 9% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
| Geography overlap | 17% | |
