A side-by-side comparison of Thoma Bravo and Blackstone across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Thoma Bravo | Blackstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1980 | 1985 |
| Firm age | 46 yrs | 41 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | — |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $160B | $1.15T |
| AUM band | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | — | 7.2× larger |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Strategy count | 0 | 0 |
| Top strategies | — | — |
| Asset classes | 3 | 0 |
| Investment style | Multi-asset | — |
| Diversification | Unknown | Unknown |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity score | 99/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 23/100 | 0/100 |
| Total relationships | 15 | 0 |
| Relationship types | 4 | 0 |
| Published funds | 0 | 0 |
| Contacts | 0 | 0 |
| DNA & Classification | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| Deal size preference | — | — |
| Geographic bias | Europe | United States |
| Relationship density | High | None |
| Network maturity | Emerging | — |
Thoma Bravo is a asset manager based in United States, while Blackstone is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Blackstone is larger ($160B vs $1.15T).