A side-by-side comparison of Thoma Bravo and Ares Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
| Thoma Bravo | Ares Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1980 | 1997 |
| Firm age | 46 yrs | 29 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Lender |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $160B | $64.4B |
| AUM band | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 2.5× larger | — |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Strategy count | 0 | 0 |
| Top strategies | — | — |
| Asset classes | 3 | 5 |
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Unknown | Unknown |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity score | 99/100 | 20/100 |
| Network strength | 23/100 | 2/100 |
| Total relationships | 15 | 1 |
| Relationship types | 4 | 1 |
| Published funds | 0 | 0 |
| Contacts | 0 | 3 |
| DNA & Classification | ||
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| Deal size preference | — | — |
| Geographic bias | Europe | North America |
| Relationship density | High | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
Thoma Bravo is a asset manager based in United States, while Ares Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Thoma Bravo is larger ($160B vs $64.4B).