DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Stonepeak vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
← Back to firms

Stonepeak vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Stonepeak and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Stonepeak$88B
Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersEUR 43B
Insight

Stonepeak manages roughly 2.0× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: StonepeakRight bar: Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Stonepeak is the largest by AUM at $88B — 2.05× Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners ($43B).
  • • Stonepeak has the broadest mandate — active across 3 asset classes vs 2 for Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Infrastructure, Private Credit.
  • • Stonepeak is the only one here in Real Estate.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, Denmark.
  • • Stonepeak's network is more connected (77/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 17% (Jaccard) — 5 shared: Renewables, Energy / Power, Infrastructure Debt and 2 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 37%, driven by 5 shared strategies, 2 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
37%Similarity score5 shared strategies · 2 shared asset classes · same AUM band
StonepeakCopenhagen Infrastructure Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesDenmark
Founded20112012
Firm age15 yrs14 yrs
RolesGpGp, Lender
Scale & AUM
AUM$88BEUR 43B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio2.0× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetinfrastructure-focused
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies22 — Core, Core-Plus, Value-Add, Opportunistic12 — Greenfield, Energy / Power, Renewables, Battery Storage / Grid
Asset classesinfrastructure, real estate, private creditinfrastructure, private credit
Shared strategies5: Renewables, Energy / Power, Infrastructure Debt
Shared asset classes2: infrastructure, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, GlobalNorth America, Europe, Asia, North America
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds2110
Largest fundStonepeak Infrastructure Fund IVCopenhagen Infrastructure V
Vintage range2021–20252018–2026
Fund statusesFundraising (6), Closed (9), Investing (6)Closed (8), Fundraising (2)
Team
Total contacts6116
Team-to-AUM ratio0.7 per $B0.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity77/1000/100
Network strength52/1000/100
Relationships400
Relationship densityVery highHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity37%
Strategy overlap17%
Asset class overlap67%
Geography overlap29%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Stonepeak and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

Stonepeak is a asset manager based in United States, while Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in Denmark. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Stonepeak or Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

By reported AUM, Stonepeak is larger ($88B vs EUR 43B).

Stonepeak profile →Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news