A side-by-side comparison of Stone Point Capital and KKR across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
KKR manages roughly 9.8× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 4 tracked between them.
| Stone Point Capital | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 2005 | 1976 |
| Firm age | 21 yrs | 50 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor, Lender | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $65B | $640B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 9.8× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private credit-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 13 — Buyout, Growth Equity, Venture Growth, Opportunistic | |
| Asset classes | private credit | private credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private credit | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 2 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Trident X | — |
| Vintage range | 2022–2025 | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (2) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 24 | 12 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.4 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 62/100 | 52/100 |
| Network strength | 39/100 | 22/100 |
| Relationships | 28 | 11 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 23% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
| Geography overlap | 67% | |
Stone Point Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while KKR is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, KKR is larger ($65B vs $640B).