DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Stone Point Capital vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
← Back to firms

Stone Point Capital vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Stone Point Capital and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Stone Point Capital$65B
Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersEUR 43B
Insight

Stone Point Capital manages roughly 1.5× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: Stone Point CapitalRight bar: Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Stone Point Capital is the largest by AUM at $65B — 1.51× Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners ($43B).
  • • Stone Point Capital is the most established (founded 2005), 7 years before Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (2012).
  • • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners has the broadest mandate — active across 2 asset classes vs 1 for Stone Point Capital.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit.
  • • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is the only one here in Infrastructure.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United States, Denmark.
  • • Overall similarity is 31%, driven by 1 shared asset classes, 40% geo overlap, same AUM band.
31%Similarity score1 shared asset classes · 40% geo overlap · same AUM band
Stone Point CapitalCopenhagen Infrastructure Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesDenmark
Founded20052012
Firm age21 yrs14 yrs
RolesGp, Advisor, LenderGp, Lender
Scale & AUM
AUM$65BEUR 43B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio1.5× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleprivate credit-focusedinfrastructure-focused
DiversificationFocusedBroad
Strategies12 — Greenfield, Energy / Power, Renewables, Battery Storage / Grid
Asset classesprivate creditinfrastructure, private credit
Shared asset classes1: private credit
Geography
Geographic biasNorth AmericaNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, North AmericaNorth America, Europe, Asia, North America
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, North America
Fund Portfolio
Published funds210
Largest fundTrident XCopenhagen Infrastructure V
Vintage range2022–20252018–2026
Fund statusesClosed (2)Closed (8), Fundraising (2)
Team
Total contacts2416
Team-to-AUM ratio0.4 per $B0.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity0/1000/100
Network strength0/1000/100
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity31%
Asset class overlap50%
Geography overlap40%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Stone Point Capital and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

Stone Point Capital is a asset manager based in United States, while Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in Denmark. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Stone Point Capital or Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

By reported AUM, Stone Point Capital is larger ($65B vs EUR 43B).

Stone Point Capital profile →Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news