A side-by-side comparison of StepStone Group and Everstone Group across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
StepStone Group manages roughly 29.1× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| StepStone Group | Everstone Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | Singapore |
| Founded | 2007 | 2006 |
| Firm age | 19 yrs | 20 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $233B | $8B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mid ($5–20B) |
| AUM ratio | 29.1× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | private equity-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Moderate |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, venture capital | private equity, venture capital |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private equity, venture capital | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Asia |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Africa | Asia, Asia |
| Shared geographies | Asia, Asia, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 5 |
| Largest fund | — | Everstone Capital Partners |
| Vintage range | — | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | — | Investing (5) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 3 | 13 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 1.6 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 64/100 | 61/100 |
| Network strength | 39/100 | 31/100 |
| Relationships | 44 | 31 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 19% | |
| Asset class overlap | 40% | |
| Geography overlap | 25% | |
StepStone Group is a asset manager based in United States, while Everstone Group is a asset manager based in Singapore. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, StepStone Group is larger ($233B vs $8B).