DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Schroders vs Stonepeak
← Back to firms

Schroders vs Stonepeak

A side-by-side comparison of Schroders and Stonepeak across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Stonepeak$88B
Insight

Schroders manages roughly 8.7× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: SchrodersRight bar: Stonepeak
Insight

Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 4 tracked between them.

Key observations

  • • Schroders is the largest by AUM at $766.7B — 8.71× Stonepeak ($88B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 207 years before Stonepeak (2011).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 3 for Stonepeak.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Real Estate, Infrastructure, Private Credit.
  • • Schroders is the only one here in Private Equity & Fixed Income, +3 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, United States.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 23/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 22% (Jaccard) — 9 shared: Infrastructure Debt, Asset-Backed Finance (ABF), Structured Credit and 6 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 22%, driven by 9 shared strategies, 3 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
22%Similarity score9 shared strategies · 3 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band
SchrodersStonepeak
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
Founded18042011
Firm age222 yrs15 yrs
RolesLp, GpGp
Scale & AUM
AUMEUR 766.7B$88B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio8.7× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment22 — Core, Core-Plus, Value-Add, Opportunistic
Asset classesprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, otherinfrastructure, real estate, private credit
Shared strategies9: Infrastructure Debt, Asset-Backed Finance (ABF), Structured Credit
Shared asset classes3: real estate, infrastructure, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasUnited KingdomNorth America
RegionsUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, AsiaNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Global
Shared geographiesEurope
Fund Portfolio
Published funds2821
Largest fundSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IVStonepeak Infrastructure Fund IV
Vintage range2023–20262021–2025
Fund statusesFundraising (26), Closed (2)Fundraising (6), Closed (9), Investing (6)
Team
Total contacts3861
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.7 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity70/10023/100
Network strength32/1005/100
Relationships232
Relationship densityHighVery high
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity22%
Strategy overlap22%
Asset class overlap38%
Geography overlap13%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Schroders and Stonepeak?

Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while Stonepeak is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Schroders or Stonepeak?

By reported AUM, Schroders is larger (EUR 766.7B vs $88B).

Schroders profile →Stonepeak profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news