DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Schroders vs Pacific Equity Partners
← Back to firms

Schroders vs Pacific Equity Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Schroders and Pacific Equity Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Pacific Equity PartnersAUD 17B
Insight

Schroders manages roughly 45.1× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: SchrodersRight bar: Pacific Equity Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Schroders is the largest by AUM at $766.7B — 45.1× Pacific Equity Partners ($17B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 194 years before Pacific Equity Partners (1998).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 2 for Pacific Equity Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit.
  • • Schroders is the only one here in Real Estate & Infrastructure, +4 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, Australia.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 3% (Jaccard) — 1 shared: Buyout.
  • • Overall similarity is 10%, driven by 1 shared strategies, 2 shared asset classes.
10%Similarity score1 shared strategies · 2 shared asset classes
SchrodersPacific Equity Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited KingdomAustralia
Founded18041998
Firm age222 yrs28 yrs
RolesLp, GpGp
Scale & AUM
AUMEUR 766.7BAUD 17B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Mid ($5–20B)
AUM ratio45.1× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetprivate equity-focused
DiversificationBroadFocused
Strategies28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured
Asset classesprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, otherprivate equity, private credit
Shared strategies1: Buyout
Shared asset classes2: private equity, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasUnited KingdomAustralia
RegionsUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, AsiaAustralia, New Zealand
Fund Portfolio
Published funds289
Largest fundSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IVPacific Equity Partners Fund VII
Vintage range2023–20262015–2024
Fund statusesFundraising (26), Closed (2)Closed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3)
Performance
Avg. net IRR—53.0%
Team
Total contacts3813
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.8 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity70/1000/100
Network strength32/1000/100
Relationships230
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity10%
Strategy overlap3%
Asset class overlap25%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Schroders and Pacific Equity Partners?

Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Schroders or Pacific Equity Partners?

By reported AUM, Schroders is larger (EUR 766.7B vs AUD 17B).

Schroders profile →Pacific Equity Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news