DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Schroders vs InfraVia Capital Partners
← Back to firms

Schroders vs InfraVia Capital Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Schroders and InfraVia Capital Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

SchrodersEUR 766.7B
InfraVia Capital PartnersEUR 16B
Insight

Schroders manages roughly 47.9× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: SchrodersRight bar: InfraVia Capital Partners
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Schroders is the largest by AUM at $766.7B — 47.92× InfraVia Capital Partners ($16B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 204 years before InfraVia Capital Partners (2008).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 4 for InfraVia Capital Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Real Estate, Infrastructure, +1 more.
  • • Schroders is the only one here in Fixed Income & Cash, +2 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, France.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 23/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 3% (Jaccard) — 1 shared: Growth Equity.
  • • Overall similarity is 17%, driven by 1 shared strategies, 4 shared asset classes.
17%Similarity score1 shared strategies · 4 shared asset classes
SchrodersInfraVia Capital Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited KingdomFrance
Founded18042008
Firm age222 yrs18 yrs
RolesLp, GpGp
Scale & AUM
AUMEUR 766.7BEUR 16B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Mid ($5–20B)
AUM ratio47.9× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadModerate
Strategies28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment8 — Value-Add, Energy / Power, Social Infrastructure, Transport
Asset classesprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, otherinfrastructure, private equity, real estate, other
Shared strategies1: Growth Equity
Shared asset classes4: private equity, real estate, infrastructure, other
Geography
Geographic biasUnited KingdomEurope
RegionsUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, AsiaEurope, France, Europe, France
Shared geographiesEurope
Fund Portfolio
Published funds288
Largest fundSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IVInfraVia European Fund VI
Vintage range2023–20262014–2018
Fund statusesFundraising (26), Closed (2)Closed (6), Investing (2)
Team
Total contacts3838
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B2.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity70/10023/100
Network strength32/1001/100
Relationships232
Relationship densityHighVery high
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity17%
Strategy overlap3%
Asset class overlap50%
Geography overlap17%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Schroders and InfraVia Capital Partners?

Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while InfraVia Capital Partners is a asset manager based in France. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Schroders or InfraVia Capital Partners?

By reported AUM, Schroders is larger (EUR 766.7B vs EUR 16B).

Schroders profile →InfraVia Capital Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news