A side-by-side comparison of Schroders and IFM Investors across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Schroders manages roughly 3.7× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 4 tracked between them.
| Schroders | IFM Investors | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United Kingdom | Australia |
| Founded | 1804 | 1994 |
| Firm age | 222 yrs | 32 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | EUR 766.7B | $204.8B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 3.7× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment | 23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure |
| Asset classes | private equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, other | infrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estate |
| Shared strategies | 7: Growth Equity, Infrastructure Debt, Structured Credit | |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, real estate, infrastructure, private credit | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United Kingdom | Australia |
| Regions | United Kingdom, United States, Europe, Asia | North America, Europe, United Kingdom, Australia |
| Shared geographies | United Kingdom, Europe | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 28 | 8 |
| Largest fund | Schroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IV | IFM Net Zero Infrastructure Fund |
| Vintage range | 2023–2026 | 1995–2022 |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (26), Closed (2) | Investing (7), Harvesting (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 38 | 43 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.2 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 70/100 | 32/100 |
| Network strength | 32/100 | 2/100 |
| Relationships | 23 | 3 |
| Relationship density | High | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 29% | |
| Strategy overlap | 16% | |
| Asset class overlap | 50% | |
| Geography overlap | 25% | |
Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Schroders is larger (EUR 766.7B vs $204.8B).