DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Schroders vs Blue Owl Capital
← Back to firms

Schroders vs Blue Owl Capital

A side-by-side comparison of Schroders and Blue Owl Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

SchrodersEUR 766.7B
Blue Owl Capital$319B
Insight

Schroders manages roughly 2.4× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: SchrodersRight bar: Blue Owl Capital
Insight

Both firms are active in 1 shared asset class out of 4 tracked between them.

Key observations

  • • Schroders is the largest by AUM at $766.7B — 2.4× Blue Owl Capital ($319B).
  • • Schroders is the most established (founded 1804), 217 years before Blue Owl Capital (2021).
  • • Schroders has the broadest mandate — active across 8 asset classes vs 6 for Blue Owl Capital.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Real Estate, Infrastructure, +2 more.
  • • Schroders is the only one here in Fixed Income & Cash, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, United States.
  • • Schroders's network is more connected (70/100 vs 64/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 13% (Jaccard) — 8 shared: Continuation Vehicles, GP-led Secondaries, Growth and 5 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 31%, driven by 7 shared strategies, 5 shared asset classes, 33% geo overlap.
31%Similarity score7 shared strategies · 5 shared asset classes · 33% geo overlap · same AUM band
SchrodersBlue Owl Capital
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
Founded18042021
Firm age222 yrs5 yrs
RolesLp, GpGp, Lender, Public Listing
Scale & AUM
AUMEUR 766.7B$319B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio2.4× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies28 — Mid-Market Buyout, Buyout, Growth Equity, Co-investment34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche
Asset classesprivate equity, real estate, infrastructure, fixed income, cash, private credit, venture capital, otherprivate credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capital
Shared strategies8: Continuation Vehicles, GP-led Secondaries, Growth
Shared asset classes5: private equity, real estate, infrastructure, private credit, venture capital
Geography
Geographic biasUnited KingdomUnited States
RegionsUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe, AsiaUnited States, Canada, Europe, United States
Shared geographiesUnited Kingdom, United States, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds2825
Largest fundSchroders Capital Private Equity Global Direct IVBlue Owl GP Stakes V
Vintage range2023–20262015–2026
Fund statusesFundraising (26), Closed (2)Closed (24), Fundraising (1)
Performance
Avg. net IRR—13.1%
Avg. TVPI—1.52x
Team
Total contacts3832
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.1 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity70/10064/100
Network strength32/10036/100
Relationships2321
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity31%
Strategy overlap13%
Asset class overlap56%
Geography overlap33%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Schroders and Blue Owl Capital?

Schroders is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Schroders or Blue Owl Capital?

By reported AUM, Schroders is larger (EUR 766.7B vs $319B).

Schroders profile →Blue Owl Capital profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news