A side-by-side comparison of Russell Investments and KKR across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
KKR manages roughly 1.5× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 4 shared asset classes out of 7 tracked between them.
| Russell Investments | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1936 | 1976 |
| Firm age | 90 yrs | 50 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $416B | $640B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 1.5× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | North America, Europe, Asia, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 3 | 4 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 100/100 | 87/100 |
| Network strength | 33/100 | 19/100 |
| Relationships | 23 | 9 |
| Relationship density | High | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 34% | |
| Asset class overlap | 57% | |
| Geography overlap | 75% | |
Russell Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while KKR is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, KKR is larger ($416B vs $640B).