DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Pacific Equity Partners vs IFM Investors
← Back to firms

Pacific Equity Partners vs IFM Investors

A side-by-side comparison of Pacific Equity Partners and IFM Investors across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Pacific Equity PartnersAUD 17B
IFM Investors$204.8B
Insight

IFM Investors manages roughly 12.0× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Infrastructure
Left bar: Pacific Equity PartnersRight bar: IFM Investors
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • IFM Investors is the largest by AUM at $204.8B — 12.05× Pacific Equity Partners ($17B).
  • • IFM Investors has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 2 for Pacific Equity Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit.
  • • IFM Investors is the only one here in Infrastructure & Real Estate.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in Australia.
  • • IFM Investors's network is more connected (71/100 vs 57/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 4% (Jaccard) — 1 shared: Senior Secured.
  • • Overall similarity is 21%, driven by 1 shared strategies, 2 shared asset classes, adjacent AUM band.
21%Similarity score1 shared strategies · 2 shared asset classes · adjacent AUM band · same country
Pacific Equity PartnersIFM Investors
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryAustraliaAustralia
Founded19981994
Firm age28 yrs32 yrs
RolesGpGp
Scale & AUM
AUMAUD 17B$204.8B
Market positionMid ($5–20B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio12.0× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleprivate equity-focusedMulti-asset
DiversificationFocusedBroad
Strategies4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure
Asset classesprivate equity, private creditinfrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estate
Shared strategies1: Senior Secured
Shared asset classes2: private equity, private credit
Geography
Geographic biasAustraliaAustralia
RegionsAustralia, New ZealandAsia-Pacific, North America, Europe, United Kingdom
Shared geographiesAustralia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds98
Largest fundPacific Equity Partners Fund VIIIFM Net Zero Infrastructure Fund
Vintage range2015–20241995–2022
Fund statusesClosed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3)Investing (7), Harvesting (1)
Performance
Avg. net IRR53.0%—
Team
Total contacts1343
Team-to-AUM ratio0.8 per $B0.2 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity57/10071/100
Network strength23/10041/100
Relationships1727
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity21%
Strategy overlap4%
Asset class overlap50%
Geography overlap17%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Pacific Equity Partners and IFM Investors?

Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia, while IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Pacific Equity Partners or IFM Investors?

By reported AUM, IFM Investors is larger (AUD 17B vs $204.8B).

Pacific Equity Partners profile →IFM Investors profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news