DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Pacific Equity Partners vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
← Back to firms

Pacific Equity Partners vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners

A side-by-side comparison of Pacific Equity Partners and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Pacific Equity PartnersAUD 17B
Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersEUR 43B
Insight

Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners manages roughly 2.5× the assets of the other firm.

Key observations

  • • Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is the largest by AUM at $43B — 2.53× Pacific Equity Partners ($17B).
  • • Pacific Equity Partners is the most established (founded 1998), 14 years before Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (2012).
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit.
  • • Pacific Equity Partners is the only one here in Private Equity.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Australia, Denmark.
  • • Pacific Equity Partners's network is more connected (57/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 7% (Jaccard) — 1 shared: Senior Secured.
  • • Overall similarity is 22%, driven by 1 shared strategies, 1 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
22%Similarity score1 shared strategies · 1 shared asset classes · same AUM band
Pacific Equity PartnersCopenhagen Infrastructure Partners
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryAustraliaDenmark
Founded19982012
Firm age28 yrs14 yrs
RolesGpGp, Lender
Scale & AUM
AUMAUD 17BEUR 43B
Market positionMid ($5–20B)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio2.5× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleprivate equity-focusedinfrastructure-focused
DiversificationFocusedBroad
Strategies4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured12 — Greenfield, Energy / Power, Renewables, Battery Storage / Grid
Asset classesprivate equity, private creditinfrastructure, private credit
Shared strategies1: Senior Secured
Shared asset classes1: private credit
Geography
Geographic biasAustraliaNorth America
RegionsAustralia, New ZealandNorth America, Europe, Asia, North America
Shared geographiesAustralia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds910
Largest fundPacific Equity Partners Fund VIICopenhagen Infrastructure V
Vintage range2015–20242018–2026
Fund statusesClosed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3)Closed (8), Fundraising (2)
Performance
Avg. net IRR53.0%—
Team
Total contacts1316
Team-to-AUM ratio0.8 per $B0.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity57/1000/100
Network strength23/1000/100
Relationships170
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity22%
Strategy overlap7%
Asset class overlap33%
Geography overlap17%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Pacific Equity Partners and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia, while Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in Denmark. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Pacific Equity Partners or Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

By reported AUM, Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is larger (AUD 17B vs EUR 43B).

Pacific Equity Partners profile →Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news