A side-by-side comparison of Man Group and IFM Investors across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Man Group manages roughly 1.2× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Man Group | IFM Investors | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United Kingdom | Australia |
| Founded | 1783 | 1994 |
| Firm age | 243 yrs | 32 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $253.6B | $204.8B |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.2× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 18 — Direct Lending, Senior Secured, Middle Market Lending, Distressed Debt | 23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate, hedge funds, other | infrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estate |
| Shared strategies | 4: Direct Lending, Senior Secured, Special Situations | |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private credit, real estate | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | Australia |
| Regions | United States | Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, United Kingdom |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 8 |
| Largest fund | Man Opportunistic Credit Fund III | IFM Net Zero Infrastructure Fund |
| Vintage range | — | 1995–2022 |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (1) | Investing (7), Harvesting (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 17 | 43 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.2 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 13/100 | 71/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 41/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 27 |
| Relationship density | Low | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 24% | |
| Strategy overlap | 11% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
Man Group is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Man Group is larger ($253.6B vs $204.8B).