A side-by-side comparison of Man Group and Fidelity Investments across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Fidelity Investments manages roughly 28.0× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Man Group | Fidelity Investments | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United Kingdom | United States |
| Founded | 1783 | 1946 |
| Firm age | 243 yrs | 80 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Advisor, Lender |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $253.6B | $7.1T |
| Market position | Giant ($100–500B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 28.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Not classified |
| Diversification | Broad | Not classified |
| Strategies | 18 — Direct Lending, Senior Secured, Middle Market Lending, Distressed Debt | |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate, hedge funds, other | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | North America |
| Regions | United States | Global, North America, North America |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 4 |
| Largest fund | Man Opportunistic Credit Fund III | Fidelity Private Equity Multi-Strategy Fund III LP |
| Vintage range | — | 2023–2025 |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (1) | Investing (4) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 17 | 7 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 13/100 | 8/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 1/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 1 |
| Relationship density | Low | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 11% | |
Man Group is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while Fidelity Investments is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Fidelity Investments is larger ($253.6B vs $7.1T).