A side-by-side comparison of Lexington Partners and Stonepeak across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Lexington Partners | Stonepeak | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1994 | 2011 |
| Firm age | 32 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $84B | $88B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment | 22 — Core, Core-Plus, Value-Add, Opportunistic |
| Asset classes | secondaries, private equity, venture capital | infrastructure, real estate, private credit |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | North America |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Global | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 21 |
| Largest fund | Lexington Capital Partners X | Stonepeak Infrastructure Fund IV |
| Vintage range | 2023 | 2021–2025 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (1) | Fundraising (6), Closed (9), Investing (6) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 50 | 61 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.6 per $B | 0.7 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 23/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 5/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 2 |
| Relationship density | Low | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 15% | |
Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Stonepeak is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Stonepeak is larger ($84B vs $88B).