A side-by-side comparison of Lexington Partners and Pacific Equity Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Lexington Partners manages roughly 4.9× the assets of the other firm.
| Lexington Partners | Pacific Equity Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | Australia |
| Founded | 1994 | 1998 |
| Firm age | 32 yrs | 28 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $84B | AUD 17B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mid ($5–20B) |
| AUM ratio | 4.9× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | private equity-focused |
| Diversification | Broad | Focused |
| Strategies | 10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment | 4 — Buyout, Buy-and-Build, Public-to-Private, Senior Secured |
| Asset classes | secondaries, private equity, venture capital | private equity, private credit |
| Shared strategies | 1: Buyout | |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private equity | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | Australia |
| Regions | Australia, New Zealand | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 9 |
| Largest fund | Lexington Capital Partners X | Pacific Equity Partners Fund VII |
| Vintage range | 2023 | 2015–2024 |
| Fund statuses | Closed (1) | Closed (1), Investing (2), Harvesting (2), Liquidated (1), Fundraising (3) |
| Performance | ||
| Avg. net IRR | — | 53.0% |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 50 | 13 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.6 per $B | 0.8 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Low | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 18% | |
| Strategy overlap | 8% | |
| Asset class overlap | 25% | |
Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Pacific Equity Partners is a asset manager based in Australia. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Lexington Partners is larger ($84B vs AUD 17B).