A side-by-side comparison of Lexington Partners and Man Group across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Man Group manages roughly 3.0× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Lexington Partners | Man Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1994 | 1783 |
| Firm age | 32 yrs | 243 yrs |
| Roles | Lp, Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $84B | $253.6B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Giant ($100–500B) |
| AUM ratio | 3.0× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment | 18 — Direct Lending, Senior Secured, Middle Market Lending, Distressed Debt |
| Asset classes | secondaries, private equity, venture capital | private credit, real estate, hedge funds, other |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | United States | United States |
| Regions | United States | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 1 | 1 |
| Largest fund | Lexington Capital Partners X | Man Opportunistic Credit Fund III |
| Vintage range | 2023 | — |
| Fund statuses | Closed (1) | Fundraising (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 50 | 17 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.6 per $B | 0.1 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 23/100 | 0/100 |
| Network strength | 3/100 | 0/100 |
| Relationships | 2 | 0 |
| Relationship density | Low | Low |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 11% | |
Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Man Group is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Man Group is larger ($84B vs $253.6B).