DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/Lexington Partners vs Blue Owl Capital
← Back to firms

Lexington Partners vs Blue Owl Capital

A side-by-side comparison of Lexington Partners and Blue Owl Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Lexington Partners$84B
Blue Owl Capital$319B
Insight

Blue Owl Capital manages roughly 3.8× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Credit
Left bar: Lexington PartnersRight bar: Blue Owl Capital
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Blue Owl Capital is the largest by AUM at $319B — 3.8× Lexington Partners ($84B).
  • • Lexington Partners is the most established (founded 1994), 27 years before Blue Owl Capital (2021).
  • • Blue Owl Capital has the broadest mandate — active across 6 asset classes vs 3 for Lexington Partners.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Secondaries, Private Equity, Venture Capital.
  • • Blue Owl Capital is the only one here in Private Credit & Real Estate, +1 more.
  • • All 2 are headquartered in United States.
  • • Blue Owl Capital's network is more connected (64/100 vs 23/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 7% (Jaccard) — 3 shared: GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Secondaries (LP-led).
  • • Overall similarity is 23%, driven by 3 shared strategies, 3 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
23%Similarity score3 shared strategies · 3 shared asset classes · same AUM band · same country
Lexington PartnersBlue Owl Capital
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited StatesUnited States
Founded19942021
Firm age32 yrs5 yrs
RolesLp, GpGp, Lender, Public Listing
Scale & AUM
AUM$84B$319B
Market positionLarge ($20–100B)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio3.8× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies10 — LP-led Secondaries, GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Co-investment34 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Unitranche
Asset classessecondaries, private equity, venture capitalprivate credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity, secondaries, venture capital
Shared strategies3: GP-led Secondaries, Continuation Vehicles, Secondaries (LP-led)
Shared asset classes3: secondaries, private equity, venture capital
Geography
Geographic biasUnited StatesUnited States
RegionsUnited States, Canada, Europe, United States
Fund Portfolio
Published funds125
Largest fundLexington Capital Partners XBlue Owl GP Stakes V
Vintage range20232015–2026
Fund statusesClosed (1)Closed (24), Fundraising (1)
Performance
Avg. net IRR—13.1%
Avg. TVPI—1.52x
Team
Total contacts5032
Team-to-AUM ratio0.6 per $B0.1 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity23/10064/100
Network strength3/10036/100
Relationships221
Relationship densityLowHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity23%
Strategy overlap7%
Asset class overlap50%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Lexington Partners and Blue Owl Capital?

Lexington Partners is a asset manager based in United States, while Blue Owl Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Lexington Partners or Blue Owl Capital?

By reported AUM, Blue Owl Capital is larger ($84B vs $319B).

Lexington Partners profile →Blue Owl Capital profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United StatesMarket intelligenceLatest news