DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
Home/Compare/Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) vs Russell Investments
← Back to firms

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) vs Russell Investments

A side-by-side comparison of Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and Russell Investments across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)GBP 1.2T
Russell Investments$416B
Insight

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) manages roughly 2.9× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Other
Left bar: Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)Right bar: Russell Investments
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is the largest by AUM at $1.2T — 2.88× Russell Investments ($416B).
  • • Russell Investments is the most established (founded 1936), 51 years before Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) (1987).
  • • Russell Investments has the broadest mandate — active across 7 asset classes vs 5 for Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM).
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate, +1 more.
  • • Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is the only one here in Other.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, United States.
  • • Russell Investments's network is more connected (71/100 vs 55/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 29%, driven by 4 shared asset classes, 50% geo overlap, same AUM band.
29%Similarity score4 shared asset classes · 50% geo overlap · same AUM band
Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)Russell Investments
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
Founded19871936
Firm age39 yrs90 yrs
RolesGpGp, Advisor
Scale & AUM
AUMGBP 1.2T$416B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Giant ($100–500B)
AUM ratio2.9× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, otherprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, venture capital, fixed income
Shared asset classes4: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure
Geography
Geographic biasEuropeGlobal
RegionsNorth America, Europe, North America, EuropeNorth America, Europe, Asia, Global
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, North America
Team
Total contacts43
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity55/10071/100
Network strength20/10033/100
Relationships1223
Relationship densityModerateHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity29%
Asset class overlap50%
Geography overlap50%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and Russell Investments?

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while Russell Investments is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) or Russell Investments?

By reported AUM, Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is larger (GBP 1.2T vs $416B).

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) profile →Russell Investments profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news