DataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
Home/Compare/Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) vs LaSalle Investment Management
← Back to firms

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) vs LaSalle Investment Management

A side-by-side comparison of Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and LaSalle Investment Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)GBP 1.2T
LaSalle Investment Management$84B
Insight

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) manages roughly 14.3× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Infrastructure
Other
Left bar: Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)Right bar: LaSalle Investment Management
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is the largest by AUM at $1.2T — 14.29× LaSalle Investment Management ($84B).
  • • LaSalle Investment Management is the most established (founded 1980), 7 years before Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) (1987).
  • • Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) has the broadest mandate — active across 5 asset classes vs 2 for LaSalle Investment Management.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit, Real Estate.
  • • Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is the only one here in Private Equity & Infrastructure, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: United Kingdom, United States.
  • • Overall similarity is 23%, driven by 2 shared asset classes, 50% geo overlap, adjacent AUM band.
23%Similarity score2 shared asset classes · 50% geo overlap · adjacent AUM band
Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM)LaSalle Investment Management
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryUnited KingdomUnited States
Founded19871980
Firm age39 yrs46 yrs
RolesGpGp
Scale & AUM
AUMGBP 1.2T$84B
Market positionMega ($500B+)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio14.3× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetprivate credit-focused
DiversificationBroadModerate
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure, otherprivate credit, real estate
Shared asset classes2: private credit, real estate
Geography
Geographic biasEuropeNorth America
RegionsNorth America, Europe, North America, EuropeNorth America, Europe, North America, Europe
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe, North America
Fund Portfolio
Published funds02
Largest fund—U.S. Real Estate Debt Strategy
Fund statuses—Fundraising (2)
Team
Total contacts45
Team-to-AUM ratio0.0 per $B0.1 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity55/10055/100
Network strength20/10019/100
Relationships1213
Relationship densityModerateModerate
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity23%
Asset class overlap40%
Geography overlap50%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) and LaSalle Investment Management?

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is a asset manager based in United Kingdom, while LaSalle Investment Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) or LaSalle Investment Management?

By reported AUM, Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) is larger (GBP 1.2T vs $84B).

Legal & General Investment Management (LGIM) profile →LaSalle Investment Management profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in United KingdomMarket intelligenceLatest news