A side-by-side comparison of LaSalle Investment Management and Invesco across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Invesco manages roughly 26.2× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| LaSalle Investment Management | Invesco | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1980 | 1935 |
| Firm age | 46 yrs | 91 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $84B | $2.2T |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 26.2× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private credit-focused | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Moderate | Broad |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure, fixed income |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private credit, real estate | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Global |
| Regions | North America, Europe, North America, Europe | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 2 | 0 |
| Largest fund | U.S. Real Estate Debt Strategy | — |
| Fund statuses | Fundraising (2) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 5 | 9 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.1 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 55/100 | 56/100 |
| Network strength | 19/100 | 17/100 |
| Relationships | 13 | 11 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 29% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
| Geography overlap | 100% | |
LaSalle Investment Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Invesco is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Invesco is larger ($84B vs $2.2T).