A side-by-side comparison of KKR and Farallon Capital Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
KKR manages roughly 14.5× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| KKR | Farallon Capital Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1976 | 1986 |
| Firm age | 50 yrs | 40 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $640B | $44B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 14.5× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Diversified |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity | private credit, real estate, hedge funds |
| Shared asset classes | 2: private credit, real estate | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Global |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, Global |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 12 | 13 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.3 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 52/100 | 46/100 |
| Network strength | 22/100 | 14/100 |
| Relationships | 11 | 21 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 27% | |
| Asset class overlap | 40% | |
| Geography overlap | 75% | |
KKR is a asset manager based in United States, while Farallon Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, KKR is larger ($640B vs $44B).