A side-by-side comparison of KKR and BlackRock across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
BlackRock manages roughly 21.7× the assets of the other firm.
Both firms are active in 4 shared asset classes out of 4 tracked between them.
| KKR | BlackRock | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1976 | 1988 |
| Firm age | 50 yrs | 38 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $640B | $13.89T |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 21.7× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Diversified | Diversified |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure | private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure |
| Shared asset classes | 4: private equity, private credit, real estate, infrastructure | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | Europe |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, Oceania |
| Shared geographies | North America, Europe, Asia | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 25 |
| Largest fund | — | Global Infrastructure Partners Fund V |
| Vintage range | — | 2020–2025 |
| Fund statuses | — | Fundraising (10), Closed (15) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 4 | 3 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 52/100 | 72/100 |
| Network strength | 22/100 | 65/100 |
| Relationships | 11 | 54 |
| Relationship density | Moderate | Very high |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 38% | |
| Asset class overlap | 100% | |
| Geography overlap | 20% | |
KKR is a asset manager based in United States, while BlackRock is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, BlackRock is larger ($640B vs $13.89T).