KKR vs BC Partners
A side-by-side comparison of KKR and BC Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Key observations
- • KKR is the largest by AUM at $640,000,000T — 16,000,000,000× BC Partners ($40B).
- • KKR is the most established (founded 1976), 10 years before BC Partners (1986).
- • KKR has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 3 for BC Partners.
- • All 2 firms invest in Private Equity, Private Credit, Real Estate.
- • KKR is the only one here in Infrastructure.
- • Each firm is in a different country: United States, London, United Kingdom.
| KKR | BC Partners | |
|---|---|---|
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | London, United Kingdom |
| AUM | $640B | $40 |
| Founded | 1976 | 1986 |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Strategies | — | — |
Frequently asked
What is the difference between KKR and BC Partners?
KKR is a asset manager based in United States, while BC Partners is a asset manager based in London, United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
Which is larger, KKR or BC Partners?
By reported AUM, KKR is larger ($640B vs $40).