DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/IFM Investors vs Stonepeak
← Back to firms

IFM Investors vs Stonepeak

A side-by-side comparison of IFM Investors and Stonepeak across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

IFM Investors$204.8B
Stonepeak$88B
Insight

IFM Investors manages roughly 2.3× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: IFM InvestorsRight bar: Stonepeak
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • IFM Investors is the largest by AUM at $204.8B — 2.33× Stonepeak ($88B).
  • • IFM Investors is the most established (founded 1994), 17 years before Stonepeak (2011).
  • • IFM Investors has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 3 for Stonepeak.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit, Infrastructure, Real Estate.
  • • IFM Investors is the only one here in Private Equity.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Australia, United States.
  • • Stonepeak's network is more connected (77/100 vs 71/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Strategy overlap is 25% (Jaccard) — 11 shared: Core, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure and 8 more.
  • • Overall similarity is 37%, driven by 9 shared strategies, 3 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
37%Similarity score9 shared strategies · 3 shared asset classes · same AUM band
IFM InvestorsStonepeak
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryAustraliaUnited States
Founded19942011
Firm age32 yrs15 yrs
RolesGpGp
Scale & AUM
AUM$204.8B$88B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio2.3× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure22 — Core, Core-Plus, Value-Add, Opportunistic
Asset classesprivate equity, private credit, infrastructure, real estateprivate credit, infrastructure, real estate
Shared strategies11: Core, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure
Shared asset classes3: private credit, infrastructure, real estate
Geography
Geographic biasAustraliaNorth America
RegionsAsia-Pacific, North America, Europe, United KingdomNorth America, Europe, Asia Pacific, Global
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds821
Largest fundIFM Net Zero Infrastructure FundStonepeak Infrastructure Fund IV
Vintage range1995–20222021–2025
Fund statusesInvesting (7), Harvesting (1)Fundraising (6), Closed (9), Investing (6)
Team
Total contacts4361
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.7 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity71/10077/100
Network strength41/10052/100
Relationships2740
Relationship densityHighVery high
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity37%
Strategy overlap25%
Asset class overlap75%
Geography overlap29%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between IFM Investors and Stonepeak?

IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia, while Stonepeak is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, IFM Investors or Stonepeak?

By reported AUM, IFM Investors is larger ($204.8B vs $88B).

IFM Investors profile →Stonepeak profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news