DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/IFM Investors vs Stone Point Capital
← Back to firms

IFM Investors vs Stone Point Capital

A side-by-side comparison of IFM Investors and Stone Point Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

IFM Investors$204.8B
Stone Point Capital$65B
Insight

IFM Investors manages roughly 3.2× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Infrastructure
Private Credit
Left bar: IFM InvestorsRight bar: Stone Point Capital
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • IFM Investors is the largest by AUM at $204.8B — 3.15× Stone Point Capital ($65B).
  • • IFM Investors is the most established (founded 1994), 11 years before Stone Point Capital (2005).
  • • IFM Investors has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 1 for Stone Point Capital.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Private Credit.
  • • IFM Investors is the only one here in Infrastructure & Private Equity, +1 more.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Australia, United States.
  • • IFM Investors's network is more connected (71/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 22%, driven by 1 shared asset classes, 40% geo overlap, same AUM band.
22%Similarity score1 shared asset classes · 40% geo overlap · same AUM band
IFM InvestorsStone Point Capital
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryAustraliaUnited States
Founded19942005
Firm age32 yrs21 yrs
RolesGpGp, Advisor, Lender
Scale & AUM
AUM$204.8B$65B
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio3.2× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetprivate credit-focused
DiversificationBroadFocused
Strategies23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure
Asset classesinfrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estateprivate credit
Shared asset classes1: private credit
Geography
Geographic biasAustraliaNorth America
RegionsAsia-Pacific, North America, Europe, United KingdomNorth America, Europe, North America
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds82
Largest fundIFM Net Zero Infrastructure FundTrident X
Vintage range1995–20222022–2025
Fund statusesInvesting (7), Harvesting (1)Closed (2)
Team
Total contacts4324
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity71/1000/100
Network strength41/1000/100
Relationships270
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity22%
Asset class overlap25%
Geography overlap40%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between IFM Investors and Stone Point Capital?

IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia, while Stone Point Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, IFM Investors or Stone Point Capital?

By reported AUM, IFM Investors is larger ($204.8B vs $65B).

IFM Investors profile →Stone Point Capital profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news