IFM Investors vs Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners

A side-by-side comparison of IFM Investors and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

IFM Investors$204.8B

Copenhagen Infrastructure PartnersEUR 43B

Insight

IFM Investors manages roughly 4.8× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Infrastructure

Left bar: IFM InvestorsRight bar: Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners

Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

• IFM Investors is the largest by AUM at $204.8B — 4.76× Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners ($43B).
• IFM Investors is the most established (founded 1994), 18 years before Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners (2012).
• IFM Investors has the broadest mandate — active across 4 asset classes vs 2 for Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners.
• All 2 firms invest in Infrastructure, Private Credit.
• IFM Investors is the only one here in Private Equity & Real Estate.
• Each firm is in a different country: Australia, Denmark.
• IFM Investors's network is more connected (71/100 vs 0/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
• Strategy overlap is 21% (Jaccard) — 6 shared: Renewables, Energy Storage, Carbon & Environmental and 3 more.
• Overall similarity is 33%, driven by 6 shared strategies, 2 shared asset classes, 43% geo overlap.

33%Similarity score6 shared strategies · 2 shared asset classes · 43% geo overlap · same AUM band

	IFM Investors	Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners
Basics
Firm type	Asset Manager	Asset Manager
Country	Australia	Denmark
Founded	1994	2012
Firm age	32 yrs	14 yrs
Roles	Gp	Gp, Lender
Scale & AUM
AUM	$204.8B	EUR 43B
Market position	Giant ($100–500B)	Large ($20–100B)
AUM ratio	4.8× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment style	Multi-asset	infrastructure-focused
Diversification	Broad	Broad
Strategies	23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure	12 — Greenfield, Energy / Power, Renewables, Battery Storage / Grid
Asset classes	infrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estate	infrastructure, private credit
Shared strategies	6: Renewables, Energy Storage, Carbon & Environmental
Shared asset classes	2: infrastructure, private credit
Geography
Geographic bias	Australia	North America
Regions	Asia-Pacific, North America, Europe, United Kingdom	North America, Europe, Asia, North America
Shared geographies	North America, Europe, Australia
Fund Portfolio
Published funds	8	10
Largest fund	IFM Net Zero Infrastructure Fund	Copenhagen Infrastructure V
Vintage range	1995–2022	2018–2026
Fund statuses	Investing (7), Harvesting (1)	Closed (8), Fundraising (2)
Team
Total contacts	43	16
Team-to-AUM ratio	0.2 per $B	0.4 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity	71/100	0/100
Network strength	41/100	0/100
Relationships	27	0
Relationship density	High	High
Network maturity	Emerging	Emerging
Similarity
Overall similarity	33%
Strategy overlap	21%
Asset class overlap	50%
Geography overlap	43%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between IFM Investors and Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia, while Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners is a asset manager based in Denmark. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, IFM Investors or Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners?

By reported AUM, IFM Investors is larger ($204.8B vs EUR 43B).

IFM Investors profile →Copenhagen Infrastructure Partners profile →

Explore more

All firms Build a custom comparison More Asset Manager firms Firms in Australia Market intelligence Latest news