DBDataBane
FirmsMarketsPeopleIntelligenceNewsDealsSign inGet access
DataBane · private markets intelligence
PlatformAboutPrivacy NoticeData RemovalContact Us
+ Add a third firm to this comparison
Home/Compare/IFM Investors vs Blackstone
← Back to firms

IFM Investors vs Blackstone

A side-by-side comparison of IFM Investors and Blackstone across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.

Scale comparison

IFM Investors$204.8B
Blackstone$1.3T
Insight

Blackstone manages roughly 6.3× the assets of the other firm.

Asset-class exposure

Infrastructure
Private Equity
Private Credit
Real Estate
Left bar: IFM InvestorsRight bar: Blackstone
Insight

No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.

Key observations

  • • Blackstone is the largest by AUM at $1.3T — 6.35× IFM Investors ($204.8B).
  • • Blackstone is the most established (founded 1985), 9 years before IFM Investors (1994).
  • • Blackstone has the broadest mandate — active across 5 asset classes vs 4 for IFM Investors.
  • • All 2 firms invest in Infrastructure, Private Credit, Private Equity, +1 more.
  • • Blackstone is the only one here in Hedge Funds.
  • • Each firm is in a different country: Australia, United States.
  • • IFM Investors's network is more connected (71/100 vs 35/100), indicating broader relationship diversity.
  • • Overall similarity is 31%, driven by 4 shared asset classes, same AUM band.
31%Similarity score4 shared asset classes · same AUM band
IFM InvestorsBlackstone
Basics
Firm typeAsset ManagerAsset Manager
CountryAustraliaUnited States
Founded19941985
Firm age32 yrs41 yrs
RolesGpGp
Scale & AUM
AUM$204.8B$1.3T
Market positionGiant ($100–500B)Mega ($500B+)
AUM ratio6.3× larger
Strategy & Focus
Investment styleMulti-assetMulti-asset
DiversificationBroadBroad
Strategies23 — Core, Evergreen / Open-ended Fund, Renewables, Digital Infrastructure
Asset classesinfrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estateprivate equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure
Shared asset classes4: infrastructure, private credit, private equity, real estate
Geography
Geographic biasAustraliaNorth America
RegionsAsia-Pacific, North America, Europe, United KingdomNorth America, Europe, Asia, India
Shared geographiesNorth America, Europe
Fund Portfolio
Published funds85
Largest fundIFM Net Zero Infrastructure FundBlackstone Capital Partners IX (BCP IX)
Vintage range1995–20222023–2026
Fund statusesInvesting (7), Harvesting (1)Fundraising (4), Closed (1)
Team
Total contacts4316
Team-to-AUM ratio0.2 per $B0.0 per $B
Network & Relationships
Connectivity71/10035/100
Network strength41/1008/100
Relationships275
Relationship densityHighHigh
Network maturityEmergingEmerging
Similarity
Overall similarity31%
Asset class overlap80%
Geography overlap22%

Frequently asked

What is the difference between IFM Investors and Blackstone?

IFM Investors is a asset manager based in Australia, while Blackstone is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.

Which is larger, IFM Investors or Blackstone?

By reported AUM, Blackstone is larger ($204.8B vs $1.3T).

IFM Investors profile →Blackstone profile →

Explore more

All firmsBuild a custom comparisonMore Asset Manager firmsFirms in AustraliaMarket intelligenceLatest news