A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity Investments and KKR across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Fidelity Investments manages roughly 11.1× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Fidelity Investments | KKR | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1946 | 1976 |
| Firm age | 80 yrs | 50 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor, Lender | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $7.1T | $640B |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 11.1× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Not classified | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Diversified |
| Strategies | 21 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Mezzanine | |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate, infrastructure, private equity | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | North America, Global, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, North America |
| Shared geographies | North America, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 4 | 0 |
| Largest fund | Fidelity Private Equity Multi-Strategy Fund III LP | — |
| Vintage range | 2023–2025 | — |
| Fund statuses | Investing (4) | — |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 7 | 12 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 52/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 22/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 11 |
| Relationship density | Low | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 19% | |
| Geography overlap | 25% | |
Fidelity Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while KKR is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Fidelity Investments is larger ($7.1T vs $640B).