A side-by-side comparison of Fidelity Investments and Blackstone across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Fidelity Investments manages roughly 5.5× the assets of the other firm.
No overlapping asset classes — these firms operate in entirely separate markets.
| Fidelity Investments | Blackstone | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United States |
| Founded | 1946 | 1985 |
| Firm age | 80 yrs | 41 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor, Lender | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $7.1T | $1.3T |
| Market position | Mega ($500B+) | Mega ($500B+) |
| AUM ratio | 5.5× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Not classified | Multi-asset |
| Diversification | Broad | Broad |
| Strategies | 21 — Direct Lending, First Lien, Senior Secured, Mezzanine | |
| Asset classes | private equity, private credit, real estate, hedge funds, infrastructure | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | North America | North America |
| Regions | Global, North America, North America | North America, Europe, Asia, India |
| Shared geographies | Global, North America, North America | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 4 | 5 |
| Largest fund | Fidelity Private Equity Multi-Strategy Fund III LP | Blackstone Capital Partners IX (BCP IX) |
| Vintage range | 2023–2025 | 2023–2026 |
| Fund statuses | Investing (4) | Fundraising (4), Closed (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 7 | 16 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.0 per $B | 0.0 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 8/100 | 60/100 |
| Network strength | 1/100 | 48/100 |
| Relationships | 1 | 22 |
| Relationship density | Low | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 20% | |
| Geography overlap | 33% | |
Fidelity Investments is a asset manager based in United States, while Blackstone is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Fidelity Investments is larger ($7.1T vs $1.3T).