A side-by-side comparison of Farallon Capital Management and Pemberton Asset Management across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Farallon Capital Management manages roughly 1.4× the assets of the other firm.
| Farallon Capital Management | Pemberton Asset Management | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | United States | United Kingdom |
| Founded | 1986 | 2011 |
| Firm age | 40 yrs | 15 yrs |
| Roles | Gp | Gp |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $44B | $32.5B |
| Market position | Large ($20–100B) | Large ($20–100B) |
| AUM ratio | 1.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | Multi-asset | private credit-focused |
| Diversification | Diversified | Focused |
| Asset classes | private credit, real estate, hedge funds | private credit |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private credit | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Global | United Kingdom |
| Regions | North America, Europe, Asia, Global | |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 0 | 6 |
| Largest fund | — | Strategic Capital IV |
| Vintage range | — | 2025–2025 |
| Fund statuses | — | Closed (6) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 13 | 17 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 0.3 per $B | 0.5 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 46/100 | 61/100 |
| Network strength | 14/100 | 65/100 |
| Relationships | 21 | 29 |
| Relationship density | High | High |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 22% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
Farallon Capital Management is a asset manager based in United States, while Pemberton Asset Management is a asset manager based in United Kingdom. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Farallon Capital Management is larger ($44B vs $32.5B).