A side-by-side comparison of Everstone Group and Lone Pine Capital across firm type, scale, strategy, and geography.
Lone Pine Capital manages roughly 2.4× the assets of the other firm.
| Everstone Group | Lone Pine Capital | |
|---|---|---|
| Basics | ||
| Firm type | Asset Manager | Asset Manager |
| Country | Singapore | United States |
| Founded | 2006 | 1997 |
| Firm age | 20 yrs | 29 yrs |
| Roles | Gp, Advisor | Gp, Advisor |
| Scale & AUM | ||
| AUM | $8B | $19B |
| Market position | Mid ($5–20B) | Mid ($5–20B) |
| AUM ratio | 2.4× larger | |
| Strategy & Focus | ||
| Investment style | private equity-focused | private equity-focused |
| Diversification | Moderate | Moderate |
| Asset classes | private equity, venture capital | private equity, hedge funds |
| Shared asset classes | 1: private equity | |
| Geography | ||
| Geographic bias | Asia | North America |
| Regions | Asia, Asia | North America, Europe, Global, North America |
| Fund Portfolio | ||
| Published funds | 5 | 1 |
| Largest fund | Everstone Capital Partners | Lone Mountain Pine Strategy |
| Vintage range | 2025 | 2025 |
| Fund statuses | Investing (5) | Investing (1) |
| Team | ||
| Total contacts | 13 | 8 |
| Team-to-AUM ratio | 1.6 per $B | 0.4 per $B |
| Network & Relationships | ||
| Connectivity | 61/100 | 31/100 |
| Network strength | 31/100 | 3/100 |
| Relationships | 31 | 5 |
| Relationship density | Very high | Moderate |
| Network maturity | Emerging | Emerging |
| Similarity | ||
| Overall similarity | 22% | |
| Asset class overlap | 33% | |
Everstone Group is a asset manager based in Singapore, while Lone Pine Capital is a asset manager based in United States. This page compares their firm type, assets under management, strategies, and geographic focus.
By reported AUM, Lone Pine Capital is larger ($8B vs $19B).